by Kylee Boyter
kboyter@cherryroad.com

On Saturday, March 1, thousands of individuals gathered at national parks across the United States to protest the recent layoffs of National Park Service (NPS) employees. This movement was strongly represented in Utah, where protests took place at Arches and Zion, as well as Capitol Reef National Park in Wayne County.

The layoffs, which affected approximately 1,000 NPS workers nationwide, have sparked debate over their consequences. In Utah alone, at least 17 employees were confirmed to have been let go, including 12 from Zion, two from Bryce Canyon, and three from Capitol Reef. These numbers, while seemingly small in the broader context, represent individuals who have dedicated their careers to preserving and maintaining these treasured landscapes.

Protesters at Capitol Reef National Park emphasized the value of these employees, not only as workers but as stewards of the land and integral members of their communities. C. Kofford, a former federal employee and passionate advocate for public lands, expressed concern over the impact of the layoffs:

“I’m a former federal employee who found my true self exploring our public lands—and I’m committed to protecting them. These firings don’t just harm workers; they hurt the land and communities that rely on them. Without its stewards, the land suffers; when land suffers, we are all wounded. I stand with our civil servants.”

Many attendees echoed similar sentiments, arguing that the layoffs would lead to increased strain on remaining employees, diminished park maintenance, and reduced services for visitors. Protesters believe these cuts not only harm the workers but also threaten the long-term health of the parks and the local economies that depend on tourism.

However, there is another perspective that sees the layoffs as a necessary step in addressing broader financial concerns within the National Park Service. Some argue that these reductions are an attempt to streamline operations, prioritize essential services, and manage budget constraints. Supporters of the decision contend that the NPS, like many government agencies, must adapt to changing fiscal realities and ensure its sustainability for future generations. They believe that while the layoffs are unfortunate, they may be a difficult but prudent move to prevent further financial instability.

This issue is complex and deeply personal for many, as national parks hold both economic and emotional significance for communities across the country, including Wayne County. As discussions continue, it is important to acknowledge and respect differing viewpoints. Whether one sees these layoffs as a detriment or a necessity, it is crucial to remember that, above all, these are decisions affecting real people, their livelihoods, and the landscapes they cherish.

In moments of division, listening to one another becomes more important than ever. These parks belong to all of us, and the people who care for them are our neighbors. While disagreements may persist, fostering dialogue and understanding will help ensure that national parks remain places of wonder, preservation, and shared responsibility for generations to come.